<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>From IHM School &#187; beauty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ihm.catholicism.org/tag/beauty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ihm.catholicism.org</link>
	<description>Educational philosophy and cultural miscellany from a classical Catholic viewpoint</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:21:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Plato and Liberal Education &#8211; Part Three</title>
		<link>http://ihm.catholicism.org/2008/12/plato-and-liberal-education-part-three/</link>
		<comments>http://ihm.catholicism.org/2008/12/plato-and-liberal-education-part-three/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sister Maria Philomena, M.I.C.M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Educational Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brother Francis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialectics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dialogues of Plato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fakhri Maluf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greek mythology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gymanstics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmonies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plane geometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholastic philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid geometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ihm.catholicism.org/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Brother Francis Maluf, M.I.C.M. Plato and Liberal Education III. The Epochs in Plato&#8217;s Educational System The key for Plato&#8217;s system of education is the Greek word μουσικε (sounds like &#8220;musikay&#8221;) which has survived in our modern languages in such words as &#8220;music&#8221; and &#8220;museum&#8221;. To the Greeks the term had a wider signification, including [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>by <a title="Posts by Br. Francis Maluf, M.I.C.M." href="http://catholicism.org/author/brfrancismaluf/">Brother Francis Maluf, M.I.C.M.</a></em></p>
<div id="attachment_187" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 210px"><a href="http://ihm.catholicism.org/files/2008/12/heartfiddle.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-187" src="http://ihm.catholicism.org/files/2008/12/heartfiddle.jpg" alt="Truth, Goodness, Beauty (Verum, Bonum, Pulchrum)" width="200" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Truth, Goodness, Beauty </p></div>
<p><strong>Plato and Liberal Education</strong></p>
<p><strong>III. The Epochs in Plato&#8217;s Educational System</strong></p>
<p>The key for Plato&#8217;s system of education is the Greek word μουσικε (sounds like &#8220;musikay&#8221;) which has survived in our modern languages in such words as &#8220;music&#8221; and &#8220;museum&#8221;. To the Greeks the term had a wider signification, including within its comprehension all the liberal arts. Greek mythology personified the liberal arts, making each one of them a goddess, a Muse, who guides, inspires, and stands as a type and an ideal. Thus we have the Muses of history, poetry, astronomy, eloquence, music, dance, tragedy, comedy, and lyric poetry. The Greeks saw beauty everywhere; whenever reality is known, it reveals rhythm and harmony, and hence education must progressively direct the mind to higher and higher aspects of beauty. The mind rises from beauty in the plane of sheer sense experience, the rhythm and harmony of sounds, shapes, and movements, to the beauty of law and order manifested in the visible world, the music of the spheres; <span id="more-162"></span>and finally to the source of all beauty, Beauty in itself, the eternal Logos, attained by the art of dialectics. Every one of the arts and sciences is called μουσικε in this sense; and it is in this sense that we must understand the passage in the Republic where Plato makes Socrates say: &#8220;When the modes of music change, the fundamental laws of the state change with them.&#8221; Corresponding to the different planes of knowledge, we can distinguish four epochs in Plato&#8217;s educational plan. Here is a brief description of each of these epochs in their sequence.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px"><a href="http://ihm.catholicism.org/files/2008/12/stlonginus.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-188" src="http://ihm.catholicism.org/files/2008/12/stlonginus.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="239" /></a>1. The first twenty years are concerned mainly with the body and with the organic faculties. The children, as early as the age of three are introduced to mythology; this is meant to train their imagination, and to cultivate love of valor and heroic deeds. The mythology must be purged of any references to the gods which might degrade the concept of divinity in the child. The fact that mythology does not give the factual or historic truth does not matter, but it must be censored and purified from anything that might give a permanently false impression of reality. Factual truth is not so important at this stage, because it is an intellectual concern, and this stage of education is mainly concerned with the senses. After mythology, follow in sequence: gymanstics, reading and writing, poetry and music, and mathematics, until finally this epoch is rounded off in two years of military training, from the eighteenth to the twentieth year. Plato recognized the imitative tendencies of the soul, and thus he prescribes that the child must be surrounded from early childhood with beautiful objects which embody the truth he will come to understand later on in life. Hence the surroundings and environment are tremendously important in this formative period.</p>
<div id="attachment_189" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 272px"><a href="http://ihm.catholicism.org/files/2008/12/brfrancis1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-189" src="http://ihm.catholicism.org/files/2008/12/brfrancis1.jpg" alt="" width="262" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Brother Francis (2003)</p></div>
<p style="padding-left: 60px">2. The second period, extending from the year twenty to the year thirty, is concerned with the sciences of measurement and understanding. Plato mentions plane geometry, solid geometry, astronomy, and harmonies. He conceives their role as a prelude to dialects. Evidently, he envisaged a patient treatment of these topics, with sufficient time for creative reasoning on the part of the students, and meditations on fundamental truths and notions which prepare the way for philosophy. This is clear from the amount of time he allows for this kind of work, although the amount of facts, principles, experiments, in such a variety of sciences, and in such a short time, that we leave him no leisure for reflection, meditation, wonder, nor for any creative work on his own initiative. Furthermore, the language of these experimental physical sciences today, is so little related to the language and truths of philosophy, that instead of being a prelude to philosophy as Plato intended, these positive sciences stand in our day as a tremendous handicap to philosophic thought.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px"><a href="http://ihm.catholicism.org/files/2008/12/dialectics.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-190" src="http://ihm.catholicism.org/files/2008/12/dialectics.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="252" /></a>3. The third epoch, which occupies the years thirty to thirty-five, is concerned with the art of dialectics, &#8220;the art which elevates the mind to the contemplation of what is best in existence&#8221;. This is the crowning mark of liberal education; the mind&#8217;s eye, which so far had been trained only to recognize the reflections of Good, must now be exercised to see the Good itself, the ultimate source of truth and beauty in the universe. To Plato, philosophy was not an organized science, or a system of sciences. The task of organizing truths of philosophy was to be carried out by his disciple Aristotle. This is why Plato was mainly concerned with the art of attaining philosophical knowledge, and this art he called &#8220;dialectics&#8221;. In our days, we possess not only the fruits of Plato&#8217;s and Aristotle&#8217;s efforts towards discovery and organization of philosophical truths. We have, in addition, the results of centuries of collective effort on the part of scholastic philosophers, ending in a body of logically related sciences, full of precise notions, clear definitions, and well established truths. This philosophic tradition was accomplished through gradual steps, beginning with sense experience and common-sense knowledge. We must remember that the individual also must grow to philosophic understanding through the same way. Philosophy is a science, but philosophizing is an art. If we realize this truth sufficiently, we would not depend so exclusively in our teaching on the presentation of philosophic truths as finally and definitely formulated. The dialect method of Plato can still teach us a great deal as to how to teach philosophy effectively, and how to train the student to raise philosophic problems, to attain a realization of a philosophic truth, and to formulate and defend this truth. We can make philosophy much more of a living tradition by reviving the Platonic method, if not the Platonic science of philosophy.</p>
<div id="attachment_191" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><a href="http://ihm.catholicism.org/files/2008/12/girsloutside.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-191" src="http://ihm.catholicism.org/files/2008/12/girsloutside.jpg" alt="Not yet philosophers!" width="200" height="323" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Not yet philosophers!</p></div>
<p style="padding-left: 60px">4. The fourth and last epoch, requiring fifteen years of life and terminating at the age of fifty, is a period dedicated to real experience in the world. It is significant that Plato did not try to carry the world into the school; the only way to know what life is, is to go through it. No man is truly wise enough to be entrusted with the destiny of a state until he has seen the real world in the light of universal truth. Philosophic ideas alone may be sufficient for the purpose of philosophic contemplation, but the philosopher-king, must make practical decisions for the common good, who must have more than ideas, namely, experience. Nor would experience without the philosophic discipline and knowledge of the Good suffice, because experience can move on a plane of insignificant facts unless illuminated by the idea of the Good.</p>
<p>It is twenty-three centuries since Plato opened his academy and invited the youths of Athens to seek the knowledge of the Good. Since that time, something has happened on our planet; the Eternal Truth, the very Person of Good, has broken the bounds of eternity, plunged into our world, and lived as one of us. If Plato were to come to life today, how would he respond to our tidings of great joy? What would he think of our response?</p>
<p><em>The End</em></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fihm.catholicism.org%2F2008%2F12%2Fplato-and-liberal-education-part-three%2F&amp;title=Plato%20and%20Liberal%20Education%20%26%238211%3B%20Part%20Three" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://ihm.catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ihm.catholicism.org/2008/12/plato-and-liberal-education-part-three/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

